It would be negligent for me not to mention the Ch4 disclosure last night regarding Farage and Reforms fund raising. Other than bland words of witch hunt, and then 2 resignations, there has been no denial from Reform. Combined with a YouGov survey on words associated with Farage which found 71% negative with racist and liar, being the most common, it makes one wonder why there is any support for the weasel. Yet there is still 27% of people who used at least one positive word to describe him – does this translate into 27% of Britons liking a racist liar? Probably not but it is my view that he should be arrested for spreading, and supporting racist views, and therefore undermining the great British Society. Are 27% of Britons racist? At different levels – probably; many would deny it and claim to have black brown or coloured friends (these people are discounted by the pseudo non-racists), but whilst there is some doubt on the degrees of racism (and 10% could be a conservative estimate of hard racism), there can be no doubt as to the lack of cognitive ability amongst nearly a third of the population. Just ask ‘would you cross a road with 50% chance of death – even 5% or 0.05%; yet when all the scientists (who are not funded by oil companies) say that we are heading for Armageddon regarding climate change they are quick to support the politicans funded by the Petro-chemical giants and support doing nothing! Fucking idiots!
Falkland Islands (Malvinas), Trump is being childish stating that he would not support the UK as they did not support him with the illegal war with Iran, despite the Americans using 2 airfields for bombing raids on Iran! His soul mate in Argentina from the far right has made noises again. As this is totally about oil reserves in the South Atlantic I believe we should obey the wishes of the residents who were unamonous in their wish to remain British (apart from someone who subsequently moved to Buenos Aires). Thatcher had North Sea oil money to send a force out their and it was a relatively close thing at the time. The UK iss probably not in a position to defend the islands anymore, unless receiving support from NATO (If Greenland – why not the Falklands?). Then we have the real threat of Russia – maybe not to us directly, but a very real threat to allies in the Baltic states (inc.Finland). and other nearby states. I am also a bit mystified as to why right wing parties do so well in Eastern Eurupe – well not that mystified – just surprised!
Analagies – my friend Andy used the analogy of how New Yorkers were in favour of deals with the Indians whilst at the frontier the settlers were all for genocide. I feel this is not a good analagy as the frontiersmen and women were basically invaders. His analogy of growing up in sectarian Belfast is also a tad biassed! So to use these examples to justify Gaza is also a bit of a stretch. Yes Hamas were out of order in their attack, but maybe justified after years of victimisation and brutality both in Gaza and the West Bank. Again the settlers are the attackers and the victims the primary inhabitants. Finally I asked about an explanation for Jewish persecution over centuries throat the world. He stated that it maybe because they were always a minority, here I shoukd have intervened more strongly, why did they not assimilate? I wondered if there was any truth in global conspiracy theories about the jews? Google states that jews own 11% of the worlds wealth – including Zuckerberg, Ellison, Page, Brin and Ballmer; and that is before taking into account ‘old money’ and property – Rothschilds possibly worth one trillion dollars. All this wealth also comes with power. We discussed how we had no idea if any friends and colleagues (in my case former) were Jewish, and agreed that we did not care. So I can claim not to be anti-semetic, but like my analysis of racism earlier, do I have an underlying anti-semitism? God – I hope not!
Andy – I think I agree with you about the greens – Polanski has no chance of winning an election or even doin g better than the LibDems, but if they concentrated on the environment and climate change there are a lot of vote winning opprotunities out there. You said Polanski was .(shallow)………. not derogatory, but had no substance. A party with a one/two policy agenda will always be criticised for this (as Reform are for their racist nonsense). but I do sense a whiff of agreement with you – a flame that burnt bright but dimming rapidly. Will he win Starmers seat – possibly but if scoring it a la football I think it could be settled with penalties!