In the UK we have 30 hours of exams to test pupils, in Canada the total is 10. Too many exams – its a no brainer.
But we need a system to test children – I would counter by suggesting that we look at what we are testing for? Employers will all require a basic level of English and Maths – this can be achieved with one 1 hour test, taken at any age. This could be at the basic GCSE level 4. I repeat the mantra that 30% of the jobs that our 12 year olds will do, do not exist at present. The curriculum would be released from the dreadful grind. Students could access a variety of subjects without facing a test at the end – purely a teachers analysis. Maybe have a pass system to record their attendance? Those who wish to pursue an academic career can have a one hour test paper which enables them to analysis materials – maybe a verbal discussion where appropriate. Non-academic subjects could be introduced like electricians and plumbing, and topics like coding introduced.
The vested interests of the exam system would be outraged, along with the geriatric party members. GCSE’s are not fit for purpose, and A Levels only appropriate in choosing academic courses. AND here is a thought – reduce university attendance by encouraging more apprenticeships and voila – the housing crisis is massively reduced. University towns would suddenly have several thousand rooms available to rent. University’s should concentrate on providing degrees which lead to employment. Student loans should be reduced.
The film and entertainment industry is worth billions in the UK – what effort is made by the educational system/ establishment to encourage this development of talent?
Of course this will mean a massive upheaval – teachers (of which there is a shortage anyway) could be split between those full time with enough take up for traditional subjects – and a part time sector where experts/professionals are brought in part time (after some initial training). Universities would probably regress to the traditional and academic, and the former poly’s offering courses leading to/part of apprenticeships with integral work experience. Or they could offer short course degrees – one or two years.
What needs to be avoided is things like personal finance – most people can work this out for themselves, as and when needed. Basic numeracy and english would suffice for most. Again offer as an evening course or correspondance course if the demand is there?
The government’s review will I fear, be stymied by the vested interests of exam boards and academics related to public schools and Oxbridge and Russell Universities. Employers want a change (until it comes to their own spoilt brats coming out from Eton, etc. All views are my own and subject to change as I become better informed!