USA?

The phrase “an enigma wrapped in a riddle” is a variation of a famous quote by Winston Churchill, originally referring to the Soviet Union. It now applies to the USA. How is anyone meant to understand a country where its largest and richest city has chosen Zohran Mamdani as its democratic candidate for mayor, whilst at the same time Trump has had his tax bill approved by Congress which includes 4.5tn in tax cuts but will also add $4 tn to the deficit? We will wait and see what ensues with the election in November for mayor. Already the uber rich are talking about moving out of New York; like they did in the UK – but evidence of an exodus is not apparent – no surge in million £ house properties. Mamdani is an avowed socialist who believes in taxing the rich, reducing wealth differentials and that billionaires should not exist! I truly hope he wins with a landslide of votes.

Meanwhile in the UK we are about to witness the formation of a new party of the left formed by Zara Sultana and Jeremy Corbyn. Unfortunately I am not sure that Britain is ready for a major swing to the left. With the BBC showcasing Reform at every opportunity (despite one of their few MP’s being suspended for financial misconduct), and the RW press going overboard at anything considered socialist or woke – or at times reasonable! any new party will struggle to be heard. The Green Party rarely gets invited to QT, And Jeremy Corbyn is unlikely to be invited any time before Antarctica melts!

However it would make a major case for Proportional Representation. Why should we be forced to chose the least objectional option when electing MP’s. 10269051 people voted for Corbyn in 2019, but Starmer only got 9,708,716 last time (with a huge majority of MP’s. I could argue that Corbyns policies were more popular than Starmers, and thatbhe was done over by the RWMeia, Johnsons charisma and a lack of support within the Labour Party. Before endorsing a Corbyn Party I would say that he did not have the graitas of world leader (but so what), he was I also believe a little naive regarding the might of the Jewish bloc, and also regarding NI.

PS. I have now picked a total of 500g of baby tomatoes – so sweet!

TV

It is time for TV companies to get topical – something they use to justify the blanket coverage of the racist Reform Party. My proposal a weekly bulletin about the climate crisis. It should include extreme weather events from around the world – todays bulletin would include the Texas floods and the heat wave in the Mediterranean. It should also braodcast the abount of renewable energy produced weekly (or daily). Green initiatives could be highlighted with expert input. It could also report on sewage events – name and shame. It could also include debate between climate deniers and green proponents.

National Grid https://grid.iamkate.com stats show 71.5% of energy used at this moment was renewable. I do not care about the arguments that it is daytime and breezy. This is 71.5% of non-polluting energy now. If we can scale this up and add battery storage we can lead the world. The Guardian today has a report on balcony solar panels – cost abot £2000. I know many cannot afford this but maybe some of the UK’s wealthy cound set up a fund to support. My solar panels repaid in 8 years and this year have been spectacular!

PS. My wild garden is well known, but I wonder just how effective it is? Does it attract insects and other wildlife? Does it lower the temperature in summer and raise it in winter? And I know I get a financial result from the herbs and Mulberries at the front and the tomato and raspberries at the back. My little apple tree is now 3m around and the replacement apricot tree is doing ok. It sounds like I have a large garden but this is not true, about 10m wide and 5m at front and 10m at back. It is wild though! A dozen roses and a large sage and a large rosemary, also thyme and a variety of mints. And tomato and a cucumber and basil in greenhouse. Some neighbours are restricting mowing – whether for ecological reasons or just lazy I have no idea!

NOT FADE AWAY

So the RW papers deemed it necessary?practical to keep the bombardment of civilians in Gaza off the front pages, whilst the death of Liverpool footballer Diogo Jota and his brother hogged the headlines. Don’t get me wrong, the death of Jota was sad but just not front page headline grabbing (back pages and in depth there too). The death of thousands of Palestinians must not be moved off the front pages. Similarly Ukraine.

It is sad that the news outlets are driven by what the public seems to want rather than what intelligent people need to be informed about? Social media was flooded with the Jota story and the chasers of the populist customer resulted in the headline grabbing. Investigation also showed that 550 drones attacked Kviv last night.

Meanwhile Cooper inserted two Neo-nazi groups in the order to proscribe Palestinian Action, thus ensuring it passed through Parliament. Thus appeasing the Israeli friendly MP’s.. The police continue to investigate the Glastonbury affair! Quite what they are investigating is beyond me? What was said is recorded both by the BBC ad multiple MOB’s. Will the CPS give the RW media their pound of flesh and increase their sales to the gammon fraternity? If the chants had been about Russia there would be no discussion.

PUZZLED

Discussion at the shop. Basically they were saying that too many people are too lazy to work and are happy to be on benefits. One person was quoted who had given up work due oto a C.S.A. claim. An unmarried mother with 3 children was stated as receiving more than the shop manager earned. I do not know the validity of these claims. However the numbers of people making claims is too high according to the general consensus of the discussion. TBH I kinda agree and disagree. I love living in a society where the NHS is almost free, education is free to 16. I am concerned that swimming pools and libraries are being shut. So I want to blame someone for the reduction in these services. I certainly agree that society should protect the weak and ill. Labour had the right idea, but it got polluted with right wing ethos. Encouraging people into work is brilliant – so why did they raise N.I. for employers? Tax the richest would be great. EQUITABLE is the key here. An equitable society would see people rewarded for risk taking and hard work. But also offer care and support to those who need it. There is a difference between need and want here.

IGNORANCE DOES NOT STOP ME

having an opinion! Specifically the Welfare Bill. With 4 million claimants there obviously needs to be some action? The working age population is 37.5 million. So nearly 10% are claiming sickness benefits? As benfits are by no means generous it says something is wrong with the economic structure of wages and the economy. the unemployed ratio is 4.6%. 75.1% of people in the UK aged 16 to 64 are currently in employment. 

So 20% of the population 16-64 are not employed. Of these There are obviously students in that number, 4.7% in higher education, but it beggars belief that 10% of the population is too sick to work! Let me do the figures again. 75.1% in work; 4.6% unemployed but looking for work; 4.7% students; 10% on sick which leaves about 6% choosing not to work or claim benefits (although most will be parents getting child benefit. We are also told that there is a labour shortage in the UK and thus have to have inward migration.

So my conclusion is that many, millions of people do not think that coping with their medical problems is enough to justify the poor pay offered? The right wing also seem to be paranoid about working from home! Maybe more employers could offer flexi-time? If the minimum wage was hiked up – how many more would be employed? Should there be a maximum wage, based on the minimum in a business? This would prevent price inflation, but ensure that companies can remain solvent and profitable?

It would seem that something needs to be done, and just cutting, already low benefits is too simplistic and not a sufficient policy to cure the problem.

Whilst revelling in statistics …… 1 in 32 children are born via UVF treatment? Basically one in every class. Here I am radical or obnoxious depending on your opinion. Would adoption be a better solution – about 50% of the child abuse uses (blamed solely and wrongly on Pakistani men) are related to girls and boys in care. Just sayin’ – I am ignorant of this issue!

Continuing with stats. BR rose in the UK last year. up 0.6%. There is a geographical difference across the UK. West Midlands had highest increase 3.4%; and London up 1.8%. There was also a 14% increase in births to/by ??? men over 60! Women aged 35-40 experienced the largest rise whilst women aged under 20 decreased by 4.6%. The other stat that I hope will not be abused is that 39.5% of births had at least one parent born outside the UK. This is absolutely positive but will add fuel to the hyperbole of the right wing. At this point I woulld like to say that I am not patriotic or nationalist – 2 terms that deserve to be condemned to the wastes of ? Glastonbury?

PUZZLED

Not an unusual state for me to be in. The Chief rabbi has said that the anti-jewish comments at Glastonbury were a national shame. From what I have seen the chants were about the IDF, not Jews. I do not consider myself anti-semitic, but if wishing for the death of the IDF as a fightighting force, then I guess I am! The Chief Rabbi needs to be careful – equating the IDF with Jews will agravate the growth of anti-semetism in the wider society. The narrative that Israel is protecting its borders has long passed – members of the Israeli cabinet have called for genocide and the death of all male Palestinians.

I wonder how many Germans actually hated or even felt any animosity to the jews? The public is easily swayed and develop a herd mentality. We have seen it with Brexit and now with Reform. Nationalism takes a putrid form when mobilised – it becomes racist and homophobic, anti-semetic and misogynist. It does not follow logic or factual realities – just the instinct of the bully and the lowest common denominator. The comments of Eavis was correct in condemning hate speech but also emphasising the love, peace and goodwill aspects of the festival. The BBC will continue to be castigated by all sides. Unfortunately it has lost any moral superiority with the blatent political appointment leaders during the Johnson era and later.

I am reminded of Edmund Burkes quote The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. Is what the IDF are doing to Palestinians in Gaza and on the West Bank EVIL? Can there even be doubt on this? And yet not only Netanyahu and Trump are supporting their blatent discrimination, but members of our government to, upto and including Keir Starmer.

GLASTONBURY

So the right wing are getting het up up about a chant. I may agree that it was out of order but demanding a prison sentence is ridiculous. Comparing the case of Connoly who was calling for migrant hotels to be torched and a chant at a pop festival “kill the IDF’. Absolutely no one at Glastonbury was going to enact the chant. I do worry that Starmer is a zionist! He condemns the chant and the use of a Palestinian flag by Kneecap. The atrocities in Gaza go largely undocumented as no journalists are allowed in the territory. And the IDF is now occupying parts of the West Bank.

I suppose I should condemn any hate speech, but when the press and politicians appear to be supporting genocide …….. there is a need for radical discussion? Would those outraged be fuming and red faced gammons if the chant had been to kill Putin or even pro-Ukraine? So maybe and only maybe, it was inappropriate, it certainly does not warrant a police investigation. We live in a country of free speech – tempered by restrictions of slander and hate speech.

The law – Hate speech is broadly defined as language that attacks or demeans a person or group based on attributes like race, religion, ethnicity, or sexual orientation.While there isn’t a universal legal definition under international human rights law, it’s generally understood as speech that incites violence, hatred, or discrimination. Laws against hate speech vary by country, but often involve restrictions on speech that is threatening, abusive, or intended to cause harassment, alarm, or distress.  So the law is a little ambiguous – whether the chant iniated violence (hardly), hatred (the hatred was already there) and discrimination ( it was not anti-Jewish just IDF?).

The BBC is being castigated for not pulling the set by the rapper. Everyone seems to be having a go! I agree with Wes Streeting – “Israel should get its own house in order”. and “it was a giant publicity stunt”. But there were a lot of performers who promotedd Free Palestine. Shoud the BBC be castigated as promoted by the shit papers and Starmer! I know his wife is Jewish but she is not Israeli! But 55,000 dead and counting.?

Israel continues to slaughter Palestinians. The latest from ministers in the Knesset calls for the slaughter of all adult males in Gaza (and the West Bank).

BRAINLESS

So Jeff Bezon is coughing up over £40 million for his wedding. Firstly how anyone is that obscenely rich is a travesty of the economic systematic rip off of the workers. Secondly – how can anyone with a brain and a concious be so immune to human suffering and poverty, that they are willing to splurge millions on a graphic and gaudy show of wealth? At least Bill Gates invested some of his wealth usefully.

The world has become very selfish. Was it Covid or is it social media? Both develop(ed) introverted behaviour. The media is mainly anti-woke, i.e. against anything that shows empathy and understanding for others. Definitely a case for increasing the tax on the rich. Basically Musk, Zuckerberg and Bezos took a gamble and it paid off. That is fine but there should be a limit to personal wealth!

Selfishness used to be the perogative of the young – too insular to realise the effect on others. But it seems that the rich have a monopoly on it! One of the papers criticised Starmer for using a helicopter recently – will they be castigating Bezos or extolling the costumes of the rich and famous. PS. what the fuck do people buy him as a wedding present? There are only so many Caribbean Islands he could visit? I like the corner of Glastonbury where Led by Donkeys and others have built a mock space craft with a caption of” send them to Mars – we party on Earth”. The images shown of people queing included Musk, Bezos, Zuckerberg, Trump and Netanyahu. however if an alien species discovered them on Mars and thought they represented life on earth – we would be totally fucked!

VENICE and Tourism

So Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez thought their wealth would enable them to “hire” Venice. The obscenity of their extravagant display of wealth was however no match for locals who threatened to flood the canals with plastic crocodiles!. However there are a reported 95 private planes flying in for the wedding. The cost is gross, and did Ms Sanchez’s space flight count as a bachelorette party? Venice is blighted by too much tourism anyway – cruise ships over 25000 tonnes have already been banned due to the congestion and pollution cased.

Unrest is spreading across the Mediterranean Region. House prices have risen by double in some cities. But wages are low in tourism, locals are forced to leave as properties are bought up to turn into Airbnb and apartments. Tourists flock from Northern European countries and movements to restrict these migrants are growing in momentum, despite the jobs they bring. Even some areas of the UK are imposing surcharges on holiday stay overs. Councils have the right to increase council tax on second homes.

So this has become a difficult problem. The right to holiday away from home in a nice environment versus the right to be able to live in ones home area. Congestion in Cornwall can be horrific at times, and parking is expensive. House prices in Cornwall have soared (especially due to covid). House pices in villages make the traditional small cottages extortionately expensive. A parking space in a laybye was sold in St.Ives for over £50000. Is there an equitable answer? Probably not. Places like Cornwall and west Wales are too remote for the growth of employment hubs. Wages are therefore depressed and often seasonal.

But conversely it is surely every workers right to escape from the urban existence once a year? 2nd home ownership is perhaps the worst example. 1 in 19 homes in Cornwall is a second home. 19000 properties are classified as second homes. Occupancy levels are 89% in peak season – but statistics out of season are difficult to obtain The average salary in Cornwall is £34.6kaccording to Cornwall Community Foundation, while the UK average salary is £42.2k.  Education levels of achievement are also lower commensurate with the employment opportunities offered. And still the Numpties voted for Brexit that cut off a lifeline of investment! It is definitely a problem – solution ?????

PAPERS AGAIN

The Sun leads with a story that asylum seekers are given a free room and food, and a job as a food delivery riders. Quite what the logic of the numbskulls is here I am perplexed! Free food and lodgings is a British tradition for those held in custody – should all prisoners be forced to pay for it? Especially when the law expressly states that asylum workers cannot work. So by wording the article the way it did, the Sun has pkaced the blame on the migrants rather than the firms (largely American) that employ them –if the stories are in anyway correct. Free identity cards would solve the problem of illegal employment. Regarding hotels and food – the system must speed up to process claims and either repatriate or get them employed legally!

Reform are suggesting a deal for rich foreigners to avoid tax – pay £250 grand and the tax man will ignore them? And yet people still vote for the C**t. The Times has started wailing at the the number of millionaires who are leaving the UK. Yes 10000 left, but
The wealthiest 1% of households had wealth of at least £3,121,500. The wealthiest 10% of households had wealth of £1,200,500 or more, while the least wealthy 10% had £16,500 or less. For the wealthiest 10% of households, net property wealth (38%) and private pension wealth (36%) made up most of their wealth. So 282000 households have wealth of £3 million +. and 10000 have fucked off. There are questions here! How many of those who have left came here because of money laundering or other financial tax breaks? Why is a million£ not enough for a brilliant lifestyle? How many actually left due to changes in the tax regieme which forced them to pay their share to society and infrastructure.

I realise these wankers contribute via the taxes their workers pay on their substandard wages, and the VAT they pay on luxury items, but be honest “do we need/want money grabbing arseholes like these in our country”.. Not only will their departure free up some very large houses, but also possibly areas of the countryside.