MALICIOUS COMMUNICATION

I understand why this law exists – Led By Donkeys claimed responsibility for the stunt which saw images of Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein projected onto Windsor Castle – just how projecting images widely circulated bu the press and internet can be seen as malicious is frankly, beyong me. Gail Porters naked image was projected on the HoC a few years ago – anyone prosecuted? It will be interesting to read the prosecution charge sheet – if it comes to that! What have they done that the press and internet servers have not? I saw the images projected on x – should Musk be prosecuted (or is his charge sheet too long already?).

However it does stimulate the question “Where is the line drawn on freedom of expression”. Posting incitements to violence are obviously not acceptable. Banksy did a brilliant graffiti outside the Royal Court of Justice, whilst pertinent and clever and thought provoking, is still graffiti on a listed building! We allow politicians to lie with abandon. Would I like an image of Farage projected on my house? Obviously not – but then I am not of interest to even my own family at times!

I am enjoying the World Athletic Championships – how the fuck does anyone jump over 2.36m or over 7’7″. insane!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *