So what is the acceptable level of risk to live with? At the moment the best is Braintree with less than 1 in 10000 people getting it in the last week (although approx 50% of people with symptoms do not get tested, and another 50% maybe asymptomatic. So maybe we should alter some numbers, although that would over simplify – round here and in Lostwithiel I would guess that most people with symptoms would get tested (until the holiday season at least). Also taking North Somerset figures it means that 30 people have tested positive in the last week. Whilst they maybe young and not a NHS problem, it does indicate that the virus is relatively common in the area, but probably being contained by reasonably good social distancing and vaccines. Go to end of table for mathematical nonsense!
27.09 | 5.11 | 19.11 | 5.12 | 7.1 | 21.1 | 4.2 | 15.2 | 22.2 | 23.3 | 9.4 | |
N.Som | 31 | 177 | 304 | 142 | 372 | 368 | 173 | 138 | 81 | 30 | 15 |
Cornw | 20 | 47 | 90 | 25 | 324 | 258 | 157 | 81 | 42 | 15 | 12 |
Bristol | 46 | 350 | 480 | 168 | 408 | 434 | 258 | 176 | 123 | 51 | 22 |
Chelm | 41 | 91 | 150 | 109 | 1058 | 573 | 247 | 141 | 75 | 29 | 16 |
Exeter | 283 | 128 | 168 | 102 | 226 | 244 | 61 | 37 | 73 | 22 | 11 |
Braintr | 42 | 58 | 109 | 104 | 1160 | 552 | 303 | 154 | 81 | 29 | 9 |
Ply | 30 | 150 | 225 | 63 | 221 | 327 | 118 | 63 | 49 | 35 | 16 |
IoW | 10 | 41 | 78 | 29 | 916 | 647 | 226 | 122 | 50 | 17 | 15 |
Liverp | 516 | 330 | 276 | 97 | 611 | 809 | 348 | 262 | 170 | 46 | 20 |
Manch | 466 | 372 | 175 | 351 | 443 | 297 | 225 | 187 | 89 | 63 | |
Sund | 274 | 309 | 412 | 161 | 514 | 426 | 327 | 270 | 186 | 86 | 34 |
Newca | 445 | 284 | 449 | 156 | 235 | 284 | 174 | 132 | 114 | 66 | 45 |
Swans | 397 | 231 | 368 | 431 | 202 | 87 | 67 | 61 | 57 | 33 | |
Cardiff | 301 | 156 | 247 | 470 | 282 | 122 | 93 | 104 | 30 | 38 | |
Glasgo | 286 | 275 | 147 | 318 | 325 | 207 | 158 | 130 | 116 | 75 | |
Aberd | 41 | 58 | 61 | 279 | 236 | 80 | 50 | 30 | 33 | 30 | |
Belfast | 317 | 213 | 109 | 504 | 284 | 175 | 143 | 115 | 64 | 34 | |
Newry | 199 | 118 | 113 | 756 | 447 | 210 | 145 | 80 | 50 | 22 | |
Sandf | 320 | 189 | 248 | 71 | 59 | 0 | 0 | ||||
W.Bod | 287 | 437 | 337 | 262 | 137 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Lostwit | 308 | 381 | 417 | 63 | 81 | 0 | 0 |
OK – here goes. These figures are all guessed or estimated. Take Bristol at the moment; 22 in 100000 have caught the virus in last week. As stated above this figure might actual be 3x this – BUT probably 95% of these people are having to work, or just arrogant bastards who do not care about others. So we are down to a number between 1 and 3 per 100000. Then you are a person who does not go anywhere at risk of catching (but one can never be certain), so we probably have a number between 1 and 10 million chance of contracting the disease. This can then be reduced by the number of people individuals or family members meet daily/weekly. So my reckoning is probably 1 in half a million for people who are careful UNDER THE PRESENT LOCKDOWN. And then I think about UK pop of 75 million and realise I am way out of line here!
But a request for people better with stats than me to start being honest! 7 Jan the figures of infections in Braintree was horrendous – vaccination does not explain this – it has to be behaviour (and thus lockdown). And now, why are the figures in the north not down as low as in the south (London is as crowded as Manchester?