Category: Politics

Some funny and rude comments about our wonderful government.

As you can see from the stats North Somerset (up 25% in 3 days), Cornwall (up 60%) and Bristol (up approx 38%) are all rather grim. I don’t know whether there is a quirk in the testing regime, but these 3 figures in particular, seem to show that the R number is getting increasingly out of control. It also seems that 500 is about a peak if measures are taken.

I am not worked up about this. I am sure they need an office, need staff, need transportation to London from their constituencies and/or accommodation in London. But I would question the whole way Parliament is run. Surely we have the technology to enable much parliamentary business to be done on line. Maybe there should be a 3 tier system for government when debating bills.

The stats are on the next page. Only a dozen selected places. But they do give bit of a picture. Cornwall and IoW ok, Exeter falling quickly (presumably to do with students, as is Bristols rapid increased? Of more concern is the steady increase in semi-rural parts like N.Som and Chelmsford and Braintree. What number has to be hit before new level imposed? I feel missing the opportunity of half term, for a circuit breaker will be regretted.

	27.09.2020	07.10.2020	23.10.2020
North Somerset	31	53	79
Cornwall	20	31	29
Bristol	46	143	228
Chelmsford	41	63	68
Exeter	283	341	175
Braintree	42	58	60
Plymouth	30	64	116
IoW	10	17	24
Liverpool	516	660	568
Manchester			458
Sunderland	274	281	297
Newcastle	445	456	298

My little survey of places in the south of England shows a 10-20% increased in last few days. N.Somerset to 64, Bristol 228, Chelmsford 68, Plymouth 98, Braintree 58, IoW 25. Only Cornwall seems unaffected at the moment in my little survey at 29. I suspect that if I did more I would find that the rate is increasing across the south. So, I am here with a laptop and can see that rates are rising fast. So act now, yes f***ing now! Not in 5 days/ 10 days time. We have been told enough times that it takes 14 days for infections to become statistics.

And stop bleating about personal freedom and the economy. Having to move to a longer shut down affecting more people and businesses will cost more in the long run.

I am not sure this will all make sense as I am developing my ideas as I progress.

I am starting with a base line of about 1990 when the average house price was about 3 x average income (maybe a little higher – hence need for 1x second income). Now the figure is 6x average income and for many areas a lot higher. This is madness that has been allowed to develop. Over 3 million 20-30 year olds are now living with parents.

A vicious Tory government imposed a bedroom tax on council tenants – why not all of us? I live in a 3 bed bungalow. I think it totally fair to tax me more because of this, but I would get a reduction in Council Tax if I was alone. I am sure that many people would come up with sob stories about family, etc. But for the benefit of society, if it made more houses come on market and reduced prices that would be great. And those living in huge houses can just pay more council tax – end of! Or sell. We live in difficult times where as usual the poor are expected to give up more and suffer.

Second homes – there are a huge number! Nationalise them – why do you need 2 homes or more? I would compensate but not at full price! The poorest are having to miss meals, worry about rent, so sorry – tough!

Renting. This is an important sector as it allows the quick and easy movement of people needed in the economy. However I think it has got a bit out of hand. Landlords are making a fortune out of rising value of premises, and this is of course theoretical money. Surely there should be a fair rent ratio, and basic standards required by landlords.

Interesting in today’s Guardian (22.10.20) suggesting that council/ affordable housing should be provided for 20-30 year olds to enable them to save for a mortgage.

Whilst the wealth of the very wealthy has increased through the pandemic, the CPS wants to prevent future tax rises and calls for sacking 160000 public sector workers, sell off valuable council houses to replace with cheap ones, cut child benefit, cut overseas aid, cut pensions. It is like some horror movie that these people (who I would guess are public school educated, or at least privileged with steady protected incomes) can sit around and work out how to screw more money from the poorest in our society. Do they practise cackling as well?